News and Views from the Desert Protective Council.

Bighorn Sheep Need a Home, Too

August 27th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in desert wildlife | No Comments »

In contrast to its good news for the Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep, the US Fish & Wildlife Service has proposed a revision to southern California bighorn critical habitat that is mostly bad news. While the Service responded to public comment by adding back  36,000 acres of critical habitat that it initially proposed to take away, let’s put this in context: This new proposal still takes away more than half of the Peninsular bighorn’s critical habitat, reducing it from 845,000 acres to just 420,000 acres, with more to be taken away should economic considerations warrant.

The public has until October 27 to submit comments, and you’ll find more info on how to do that here in the days ahead. But even more important is a PUBLIC HEARING on the revised habitat that is coming up fast:

  • Date: Wednesday, September 10
  • Times: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
  • Place: The Living Desert, 47-900 Portola Ave., Palm Desert, California

Mark your calendars, and we’ll hope to see you there.

Just the Worst Details
One of the worst features of the plan is its proposal to break up the bighorn’s habitat into three separate areas, defying the well proven importance of habitat connectivity. The habitat plan even excludes land that is now owned by Anza-Borrego Desert State Park that connects the Vallecito Mountains to the Tierra Blanca and Sawtooth ranges.

Another questionable contention of the revised habitat plan is that critical habitat should only be designated where bighorn have been sighted since the late 1980s. Under this requirement, no wolves would have been re-introduced to the northern Rockies, and the entire California condor recovery effort would have been impossible. The sightings requirement leaves out huge swaths of land that still provide valuable habitat and that could one day support a naturally recolonized or re-introduced bighorn population. As Dr. Jon Wehausen and others have shown, bighorn sheep re-colonize abandoned ranges all the time.

Lisa Belenky of the Center for Biological Diversity called the proposal “a blueprint for extinction, not recovery.” Joan Taylor of the Coachella Valley Sierra Club said, “The administration has caved to special development interests, and the bighorn have gotten the shaft in the process.” And one highly placed official with the original Peninsular bighorn recovery effort called the Service’s action “despicable.”

(Photo by Larry Hogue)

Big Solar Should Use Disturbed Lands

August 25th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in renewable energy | 1 Comment »

The Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI) stakeholders group needs to hear from you — by Wednesday! — with the message that disturbed lands need to be given priority over undisturbed habitat as the group evaluates “Competitive Renewable Energy Zones”  (CREZs). Some of the stakeholders actually seem to prefer building solar facilities in undisturbed habitat – a policy that makes no sense considering the thousands of acres of abandoned agricultural lands in the desert.

More information on RETI is here.

The environmental stakeholders in the group, Johanna Wald of the Natural Resources Defense Council and Carl Zichella of the Sierra Club, need to hear from as many people as possible supporting the preference for already disturbed lands.

Just drop Carl and Johanna a quick e-mail, with the following comments on the “RETI Interim Draft Reports” (suggested by John Moore of the California-Nevada Desert Committee of the Sierra Club):

1) state your strong support for preferring the use of disturbed lands, including agricultural lands
2) support including a disturbed lands criterion in the comparison of CREZs

Send your comments to: carl.zichella@sierraclub.org and jwald@nrdc.org  (we don’t include live e-mail links, so you’ll need to cut and paste these e-mail addresses).

Carl and Johanna will then pass your comments on to the rest of the stakeholders group. Deadline is Wednesday, August 27!

(Photo of Kramer Junction concentrated solar power facility courtesy of Wikimedia.)

Wee Thump Joshua Tree Wilderness

August 23rd, 2008 Posted by Chris Clarke in desert plants, desert wildlife, wilderness | 6 Comments »

This month a friend and I sat bathed in moonlight on the fringes of a desert wilderness, enjoying a hundred-mile view. Eastward we saw towering thunderheads, illuminated from within by frequent and gigantic lightning flashes as they released their catastrophic rains upon the Grand Canyon. The storm was far enough away that we heard no thunder: just the calls of nearby coyotes and owls. When we awoke the air was clear, and the surrounding mountains — where we could see them through the thick Joshua tree forest — seemed close enough almost to touch.

Southern Nevada’s Wee Thump Joshua Tree Wilderness does offer great views. At just 6,050 acres, though, the long views are outside the wilderness’ boundaries. Wee Thump isn’t a classic rock and ice wilderness in the style of Ansel Adams. But it is stunningly beautiful, a rare piece of relatively intact Mojave biome in a surprisingly accessible location.

Designated as wilderness in 2002, Wee Thump — the name means “The Ancient Ones” in the local Paiute language, a reference to the land’s aged Joshua trees — is a gently sloping alluvial fan in a roughly triangular valley between the McCullough and Highland ranges and the north shoulder of the New York Mountains, just west of Searchlight, NV. Though the wilderness contains only one designated trail, an old miner’s wagon track that stays frustratingly close to route 164, the constantly changing washes offer abundant opportunities for hiking into the heart of the wilderness.

And that wilderness has some heart. The Joshua trees are there in abundance, along with their cousins the Mojave and banana yuccas. (Wee Thump is in fact part of that narrow strip of desert in which the ranges of the latter two yuccas overlap.) The cactus family is well represented here, with red-spined barrel cacti surprisingly abundant, along with a healthy diversity of chollas and a number of other common (and less-common) Mojave species. Here and there throughout the wilderness the hiker can find incongruous single-needle piñons, growing well away from their usual mountain haunts at elevations as low as 4,500 feet. Junipers and a wealth of broadleaved shrub species, blackbrush and sage in the higher parts of the wilderness and creosote downslope, fill out the desert floor. The washes hold a staggering display of annual flowers in season.

With that diverse a flora, it’s no surprise the Wee Thump fauna is also rather diverse. You can’t hike for long down a Wee Thump wash without finding evidence of desert tortoise burrows, coyote and deer and (if you’re lucky) bighorn tracks in the sand, a ridiculous number of Audubon’s cottontails, black-tailed jackrabbits, and antelope ground squirrels, k-rats and packrats. There are at least four different lizard species here, five if my local informant’s report of banded Gila monster is to be believed. Those sinuous tracks in the wash sand may well have been made by rattlers, though there are plenty of red coachwhips here as well. And the birds dominate the landscape, or at least the aural landscape. Cactus wrens seem to call from every Joshua tree on summer days, giving the Scott’s orioles some competition. Sage and black-chinned sparrows flit from shrub to shrub. Seeing golden eagles here is not at all uncommon.

Sadly, the Wee Thump soundscape may have a new addition before long: Clark Country is attempting to build a major commercial airport in the neighboring Ivanpah Valley near Primm, and flight paths designed to avoid the nearby Mojave National Preserve will almost certainly send planes over this little wilderness. Hearing the daytime iambic call of a Scott’s oriole, or the romantic serenade of a coyote family, may soon be quite a bit more difficult. You can watch this space for more on the Ivanpah Valley airport project and how you can work to stop it.

But in the meantime, Wee Thump still waits quietly for your visit.

The Wee Thump Joshua Tree Wilderness is on Nevada Route 164 — designated the Joshua Tree Parkway — between Searchlight and Nipton, California. From Southern California take Interstate 15 toward Las Vegas, leave the freeway at the Nipton Road exit about ten miles before the State Line, and turn right on Nipton Road, California Route 164.

Set your trip meter as you cross the railroad tracks in Nipton. In about two miles you’ll cross into Nevada. The route number stays the same on the other side of the line as the road winds up Big Tiger Canyon through a thickening Joshua tree forest. On the other side of a low pass, at around ten miles from Nipton, a poorly-marked parking lot offers trailhead access to the Wilderness. Don’t fret if you miss the turn. Just past 13 miles from the Nipton crossing, a well-graded dirt road will run into the forest to your left. A few miles off the pavement this road is definitely of the high-clearance-only variety, but even a low-slung rental car will find easy passage to a parking area near a windmill not far from the pavement. Get out and walk around, on the wilderness’ perimeter road or through some of the above-mentioned washes. Route-finding skills are important here, as the washes meander a bit confusingly and it’s easy to lose your bearings. (This is a good place for you to practice your GPS skills, in other words.) There’s primitive camping in spots along the south side of the access road, or you can take advantage of limited lodging and supplies in Nipton, or somewhat greater options in Searchlight, which is about seven miles farther east on 164.

photo by Chris Clarke

How You Can Help the Desert Tortoise

August 21st, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in desert wildlife | 1 Comment »

Following up on last week’s post, here are a few things you can do to help the desert tortoise:

  • Comment on the US Fish & Wildlife Service’s revised recovery plan (large PDF!) for California’s state reptile. The plan has been criticized by the Center for Biological Diversity, and we’ll have more info for you soon on the details of the plan.
  • If you’d like to do something more concrete for the tortoise, a work party is being conducted October 18 & 19 by the Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee to restore habitat for the tortoise at the Desert Tortoise Natural Area. The preserve is located northeast of Mojave and southwest of Ridgecrest. More information here.
  • For science geeks only: feed your head with these abstracts from the Desert Tortoise Council’s 2008 Desert Tortoise Symposium. Or, for more basic info, check Defenders of Wildlife’s fact sheet on the tortoise.

Palms to Pines Map Now Available

August 19th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in Art & Nature | No Comments »

The “Palms to Pines Birding and Nature Trail Map” is now available from Friends of the Desert Mountains, authored by soon-to-be DesertBlog contributor Ruth Nolan, and DPC member Kurt Leuschner. Ruth worked on the project during her sabbatical (2006-07) from her post as Associate Professor of English at College of the Desert. Kurt Leuschner, a natural resource specialist, is also a professor at the college.

The map, released in February, 2008, features 10 trails ranging from the Mojave to the Colorado deserts:

1. Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Monument National Monument
2. Living Desert Reserve - Palm Desert/ Indian Wells
3. Indian Canyons - Tahquitz Canyon
4. Mt. San Jacinto State Park
5. Morongo Canyon (references to Whitewater & Pipes Canyon)
6. Joshua Tree National Park
7. Salton Sea
8. Anza-Borrego Desert State Park
9. Indio Wild Bird Center
10. Coachella Valley Preserve/Thousand Palms Oasis

The map is available for viewing at the Friends of the Desert Mountains website. Copies of the map are available for free to the public by contacting the Friends at their website; at the Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Visitor Center located in Palm Desert, CA; and at the visitor centers for the destinations listed above.

For talks and lectures on the map, or for additional hard copies contact:

  • Ruth Nolan runolan@aol.com or (760) 964-9767
  • Kurt Leuschner, kleuschner@collegeofthedesert.edu (760) 776-7285

Endangered Species Act Under Attack

August 15th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in Endangered Species | No Comments »

In its never-ending war on the natural world, the Bush Administration has proposed rules that would gut the Endangered Species Act, one of our nation’s prime defenses against abuse of nature, whether that abuse is carried out by the government, corporations, recreational groups, property owners, or other groups.

Daniel Patterson has a great blog post about it, and the Center for Biological Diversity has an easy way for you to take action.

Wind Energy Update

August 13th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in renewable energy | No Comments »

Following up on our July 26th post: the Bureau of Land Management has scheduled a public meeting for tonight in Julian about its plans to vastly expand areas available for wind energy northward into the Oriflamme Mountain, Banner, Julian, San Felipe Hills and San Ysidro Mountains areas. Here are the details on the meeting:

View a map of the proposed wind energy expansion here. The Banner area is traversed by the Pacific Crest Trail, as are the San Felipe Hills, while Oriflamme Mountain is part of the PCT’s “viewshed” (as well as that of the Sunrise Highway). A big question is how these areas, some of them very remote and rugged, would be connected to the region’s energy grid. Are there existing transmission lines nearby? Or would these wind farms require new transmission lines, and if so, how large?

Perhaps these questions are better answered in a project EIS, but it seems foolish to designate remote, roadless areas as open to wind energy development without some analysis of the existing infrastructure. The Sierra Club’s policy on wind energy provides good guidance here: wind energy is good, but should be developed in or near areas with existing infrastructure such as roads and transmission, and should avoid parks, preserves and critical habitats.

The BLM map also includes an area labeled for geothermal energy development east of Jacumba and south of Interstate 8.

Deadline for comments is August 27, but activists hope to get that extended, considering that this is a significant change to the Final EIS on the Eastern San Diego Resource Management Plan.

Comments may be e-mailed to: caesdrmp@.ca.blm.gov, faxed to: (760) 337-4490, or mailed to: Erin Dreyfuss, Planning and Environmental Coordinator, BLM El Centro Field Office, 1661 S. 4th Street, El Centro, CA 92243.

Baja California wind energy projects are also affecting San Diego County. The Dept. of Energy will conduct an Environmental Assessment of a proposed new transmission line connecting the Baja Wind (Sempra Energy) project in La Rumarosa, Mexico, with the Southwest Powerlink east of Jacumba. The project will also involve building a new substation east of Jacumba. More details on the project, including a map on page 16, are available here. Read the Federal Register notice here.

The Dept. of Energy will hold a public scoping meeting on the new transmission line at the end of this month. Here are details:

  • Date: August 26, 2008
  • Times: 1 to 3 p.m., and 5 to 7 p.m.
  • Place: Jacumba Highland Center, 44681 Old Hwy 80, Jacumba

Deadline for comments on this one is September 3. The Federal Register notice has contact info.

Good News for Bighorn, Bad News for Tortoise

August 12th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in desert wildlife | 2 Comments »

There was good news for Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep last week, as the US Fish & Wildlife Service finalized critical habitat for this population of bighorn, cousins to the desert bighorn of the southwest. The new decision on critical habitat came as a result of a lawsuit by our friends at the Center for Biological Diversity; you can read their press release about the issue here.

Let’s hope the feds make a similar wise decision with the Peninsular bighorn, and withdraw a proposal to reduce critical habitat for this sub-population of desert bighorn by more than half. (Fish & Wildife has been strangely silent on this issue since last winter — maybe they’re just waiting for the end of the Bush administration?)

The Center for Biological Diversity is also on the case of the desert tortoise, and report that a recently announced “recovery plan” for the state reptile is actually not a recovery plan at all. CBD biologist Ileene Anderson had sharp words for Fish & Wildlife’s plan: “Desert tortoise recovery requires on-the-ground action, but this plan’s focus is ‘planning to plan,’ ” said Anderson. “The current recovery plan provides a science-based roadmap to recovery. But the administration has spent the last two years rewriting and weakening the plan because it finds recovery actions to be politically inconvenient. Without an immediate course correction, the administration is effectively pushing the tortoise to extinction.” Read more about the tortoise recovery plan and the Center’s response to it here.

Top photo: Larry Hogue (That’s a desert bighorn from Arizona, not a Sierra bighorn, but you get the idea.)

Bottom photo: courtesy USGS

 

Writin’ and Rockin’ in the Desert

August 8th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in Art & Nature, Sunrise Powerlink | 1 Comment »

Need a break from the gloom, doom and snarky sarcasm of DesertBlog? Chris Clarke has some great stuff posted on his Coyote Crossing site: desert poetry, essays, and tidbits from his summer basecamp in Nipton — can you say “hot”? And he doesn’t even have air conditioning yet. Check it out at: http://www.faultline.org.

Need yet more diversion? Ranchita Rocks 2008 is coming up on the weekend of September 12, 13 and 14. This benefit concert supporting the Protect Our Communities Fund to stop the Sunrise Powerlink will feature a long list of bands, including Yonder Mountain Stringband, DJ Bassnectar, and ’60s rockers Mountain, as well as comedy acts, drum circles and other events. Held on six stages at the GoLightly horse ranch in Ranchita, the event will be powered by solar, wind energy and biodiesel.

 

Early bird pricing has been extended through August 15, so get your tickets now: http://www.ranchitarocks.org.

Next week: back to the gloom and doom with the recently announced desert tortoise “recovery” plan.

Sunrise Powerlink Letter-Writing Opportunity

August 6th, 2008 Posted by Larry Hogue in Sunrise Powerlink | No Comments »

Last Sunday, the Desert Sun newspaper published an opinion piece on the Sunrise Powerlink by former California Energy Commission chairman Bill Keese, which denied that the Sunrise Powerlink is really about power plants in Mexicali (like the one at the left).  Mr. Keese’s response, titled “Sunrise Powerlink best way to transport renewable energy,” contained surprisingly weak evidence and logic.

In hopes that those of you in the Desert Sun’s circulation area can write a letter to the editor in response to this opinion piece, here are some facts that counter Mr. Keese’s arguments. (One of DesertBlog’s Twitter followers is planning to send in a letter, but the more the better!)

First, in calling the Sunrise Powerlink opposition’s arguments “falsehood and propaganda,” Mr. Keese could not fully deny the opposition’s main claim — that this transmission line is really about carrying fossil-fueled energy from Baja, not renewables from Imperial Valley — but had to equivocate (i.e. throw in some weasel words).

“For starters,” he wrote, “the Sunrise Powerlink is not being built to get electricity from American power plants in Mexico.” That sentence may be technically true, but take the word “American” out, and it falls apart.

The La Rosita power plant outside of Mexicali (pictured above) is owned by InterGen, a global power company headquartered in the Netherlands. Any future power plants could be built by foreign corporations as well. The point is, Sempra Energy (SDG&E’s parent company) has invested billions in supplying natural gas from overseas to a ring of power plants in Mexico and the southwest U.S. that can distribute power to southern California. The ownership of the power plants is immaterial — Sempra simply stands to gain when more power plants are built in Mexico. But it can’t do that without the Sunrise Powerlink (which is designed to be extended into Los Angeles). To believe that Sempra and SDG&E are not going to maximize their investment — by promoting as much gas-fired production as possible — is simply naïve.

If the true purpose of the line were to bring renewables to San Diego, then SDG&E would be happy with the southern route. But the company is so opposed to the southern route that it incorrectly informed the PUC that it would be impossible to build the line on the southern routing because of tribal opposition. SDG&E’s reason for opposing the southern route is that a southern line can’t be extended into the Los Angeles energy market, a key objective for Sempra/SDG&E.

On the other hand, the northern route is designed expressly to allow it to one day extend from Warner Springs into Temecula and the Los Angeles grid: a 500-kv line would extend from the Imperial substation (already tied in to the gas-fired power plants outside of Mexicali) to a substation near Warner Springs. From there, only a 230-kv line would head south to San Diego, with the possibility for another 230-kv line heading north to Los Angeles in the future. If SDG&E’s true goal were to get power from Imperial to San Diego, it would build one 500-kv line all the way to San Diego, or else make the entire line 230-kv (which, by the way, would allow it to be undergrounded, thereby muting at least some of the line’s opposition).

In the face of all these facts, Mr. Keese’s simple contention that the Powerlink is not about getting gas-fired power into the U.S. is exceedingly weak.

Keese’s second big error is that “The opposition to the Sunrise Powerlink emanates largely from the fact that 22 miles of this line would go through an extremely small patch of the 65,000-acre Anza Borrego State Desert Park.” (Come on, Bill, please at least get the size and name of the park right!) Contrary to Mr. Keese’s contention, there are many problems with the Sunrise Powerlink, beyond the fact that it would cross Anza-Borrego. These include:

  • lack of reliability due to San Diego’s frequent wildfires in the mountains (the line would have been out of commission during both the 2003 and 2007 wildfires in San Diego, had it existed at that time) and earthquakes and flash floods in the desert
  • wildfire ignitions and interference with fire-fighting efforts
  • a massive waste of ratepayer dollars on a project that has no guarantee to carry renewable energy (San Diegans heard the same promises from SDG&E with the Southwest Powerlink, promises that have been broken)
  • the highly experimental and unreliable nature of the Stirling solar technology the Sunrise Powerlink is supposed to link to
  • the fact, pointed out in the EIR, that construction and operation of the line will create more greenhouse gas emissions than would be saved, even if the line carried 100% renewable energy
  • the fact that transmission is last on the list of renewable energy solutions in California’s official “Loading Order” for renewable energy, with energy efficiency, demand response and conservation given the highest priority, and actually building renewables and clean energy projects coming in second (a recent New York Times op-ed piece underscored the primacy of efficiency and conservation)
  • recent changes in the solar market place, thanks to advances in “thin film” photovoltaic solar technology, which make projects like Southern California Edison’s 250-megawatt rooftop solar proposal more economical than large-scale solar farms in the desert (9 to 12 cents/kilowatt vs. 14.5 cents per kilowatt), not to mention much less environmentally destructive and easier to get through the regulatory process (see this previous DesertBlog post). These changes, occuring in the past several months, make the Sunrise Powerlink even less necessary than when it was first proposed.

Then there’s the absurdity of Mr. Keese’s contention that the statewide pro-Sunrise group, CalCARE, somehow represents a “collaborative” approach. The only “collaborative approach” going on in this coalition of business interests is the usual “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” common to chambers of commerce and business roundtables. (Has the chamber even considered doing a critical analysis the Sunrise Powerlink’s effect on its member businesses’ electricity rates?)

And finally, contrary to Mr. Keese’s statement that “It is is easy to demand cleaner energy without offering viable solutions,” opponents of the Sunrise Powerlink have indeed presented a better alternative to the Powerlink. The San Diego Smart Energy 2020 plan (www.sdsmartenergy.org) provides an energy solution for San Diego that reduces its energy-related carbon footprint by 50% (far more than would be possible with the Sunrise Powerlink), while preserving our backcountry and desert landscapes.

To write a letter to the editor to the Desert Sun, go here.